What is Patrick Süskind's writing style?

Süskind writes in a cold, faintly antique third-person voice built around one technical problem: how to put smell on a page in a language that has few words for it. His answer is to name sources instead of sensations, stack them inside a repeated clause frame until they accumulate, and tie each one to something a character then does about it. Over the top of that sits an intrusive narrator who passes judgement early and reports flatly afterwards. The shorter books keep the voice and drop the perfume.

How does Süskind describe smell in Perfume?

By naming what produces the smell and letting the reader supply the sensation. The novel opens on a Paris where the chimneys stink of sulphur, the tanneries of caustic lye, the slaughterhouses of congealed blood, and the people themselves of sweat and unwashed clothes, and the run keeps climbing through the trades and the parishes until the king stinks too. Look at the shape: one verb, one preposition, a fresh noun per member. The adjectives are doing almost nothing, and the nouns are doing a job adjectives fail at.

What happens in the cave scene, and why is it in the middle?

Grenouille spends seven years alone in a cave inside the Plomb du Cantal, and there he discovers that he has no smell of his own. It sits in the middle because it is the hinge: the first half is a nose collecting the world, the second is a man manufacturing the one thing he lacks. As craft it is a long interior stretch with almost no external event, held up by an inventory of remembered scents. That inventory was earned page by page in the first half, which is the only reason the scene holds.

Can you use any of this if you are not writing about smell?

The wiring travels, the subject does not. Three moves carry across: name the source rather than the sensation, repeat one clause frame so a list turns into a rise, and give each perception a consequence in the following sentence. Point them at sound, food, weather or money and they behave the same way. The perfume is the demonstration.

Why does the 2006 film feel so different from the novel?

Because Tom Tykwer had to solve a problem the novel does not have. Prose can name a source and let a reader's memory do the smelling. Film has to show something, so the adaptation converts smell into close-ups, sound and Ben Whishaw's face receiving it. Readers who arrive from the film and want the technique should start with the first chapter of the book, which is where the method lives and also the part that does not survive the move to images.

Which Süskind book teaches the technique fastest?

Perfume for the sensory method, and Die Taube for the same voice on a small canvas. A Paris bank guard finds a pigeon in the corridor outside his room and his life comes apart inside a day, which shows what the style does with an ordinary subject and is short enough to reread in an evening with a pencil in your hand, marking each place where a physical detail takes over a job that a sentence about feeling would usually do. Der Kontrabass is the outlier, a monologue for one player, and it is where you hear Süskind write a voice rather than a nose.

Fiction

Patrick Süskind Writing Style

Born March 26, 1949

Analysis by Prosematter's editorial team · Updated September 5, 2026

Smell has almost no vocabulary of its own, so Süskind writes it by naming the thing doing the smelling and stacking those things until the reader's nose gives in.

Write like Patrick Süskind See how editing in Prosematter works

Writing Style Overview

Writing style overview of Patrick Süskind: voice, themes, and technique.

Patrick Süskind's style is an answer to a shortage of words. Sight has a vocabulary and sound has one. Smell has almost nothing of its own, so a writer reaching for it lands either on a verdict, foul or sweet or rank, or on the name of some other thing that happens to smell the same way. Süskind stops reaching for the adjective. He names the source and lets your nose finish the sentence, and Perfume opens with pages of that one move at full stretch: the streets stank of dung, the yards of urine, the stairwells of rotting wood and rat droppings, the kitchens of bad cabbage and mutton fat, the bedrooms of greasy sheets, and the catalogue climbs the social order until the king stinks too.

That inventory is not scenery. It delivers the protagonist. The stink narrows from a whole city down to the fish stalls beside the graveyard of the Innocents, and Jean-Baptiste Grenouille is born into the worst of it. After that, smell is the motive rather than the backdrop. He follows the scent of a girl in the Rue des Marais across Paris, kills her because there is no other way to keep it, and spends the remainder of the book trying to make that one scent again.

The voice reporting this behaves like an eighteenth-century historian who disapproves of his subject. He passes his verdict in the opening sentence, before you have met the man: one of the most gifted and most abhorrent figures of an age not short of either. Then he explains. Step by step, in the register of a record, he sets out what Grenouille smells, what he wants and what follows, until the arithmetic of a murder is something you have been reading along with rather than watching. That is the trap, and it is built out of tone.

Two more things are worth stealing. One is the trade vocabulary. Baldini teaches distillation in a shop on the Pont au Change, the Grasse chapters work through maceration and enfleurage, the cold-fat method for flowers that cannot take heat, and those words go unexplained on the page the way a working perfumer would not stop to explain them to another perfumer, so the reader picks the trade up by overhearing it. The other is an absence. Seven years inside a mountain in the Auvergne, the Plomb du Cantal, with a remembered cellar of scents for company, Grenouille works out that he smells of nothing, and Süskind renders that nothing as concretely as he renders the fish stalls, giving the absence a shape and a set of consequences that other people had been reacting to for years without being able to name what was wrong.

How to Write Like Patrick Süskind

Writing techniques and exercises to emulate Patrick Süskind.

1
Name the source, not the sensation
Write down what is making the smell instead of what it is like. Wet wool. Diesel. Cat fur after rain. Then delete the adjectives you had planned and keep the nouns, because a noun arrives with a surface, a weight and a place attached, where a word like pungent arrives with a rating. The first chapter of Perfume works this way and nothing else, and a reader smells a whole city without being told how the city smells. Take one paragraph of your own tonight, run the swap, and count how many of the adjectives you started with survive it.
2
Hold one frame and change only the things
Pick a sentence shape and repeat it. The Paris opening keeps the same verb and the same preposition through a dozen members, so the ear soon stops hearing the frame and hears the changing nouns instead, and the run accumulates instead of listing. Order decides the ending. Süskind climbs from streets to people to priests and finally to the king, which turns an inventory into a rise. Write eight members in one frame and put the worst of them last.
3
Make the perception cause the next move
A described smell that changes nothing is furniture. Hang a consequence on it in the following sentence: a decision, a lie, a detour. Grenouille smells the girl in the Rue des Marais and walks across Paris, so the murder is the consequence of the description rather than its neighbour. Proust wires the same circuit in reverse in Swann's Way, where a madeleine dipped in lime-blossom tea opens the whole of Combray and the sensation buys memory instead of motive. Either direction is legitimate. A sensation that buys nothing should go.
4
Borrow a working vocabulary and get it right
Süskind did the reading. Baldini's shop distils, Grasse macerates and works the flowers into cold fat, and the terms sit in the text the way a perfumer would use them, with no footnote. Find the equivalent register for your own subject, whether that is falconry, anaesthesia or scaffolding, and learn enough of it to drop three terms in passing without stopping to define them. Precision about the incidental is what makes the improbable go down, and your premise will struggle to be less probable than a man with a perfect nose and no smell of his own.
5
Keep the voice colder than the material
Set the register one notch below the content and leave it there. The murders in Perfume are reported at the pitch of a weather note, and a reader who is not being shouted at keeps reading and keeps agreeing. Kafka opens Die Verwandlung on a man who has become an insect and spends the next page on his travelling-salesman timetable, in the prose of an insurance file. Take your most extreme paragraph and rewrite it in the tone of a maintenance report. Whatever survives was content. Whatever goes was volume.
6
Push the naming to the back
German hands Süskind a delay that English has to manufacture. Its finite verb is held back to the close of a subordinate clause, so a long period stays undecided down to its final word, and Thomas Mann built the sentences of Der Tod in Venedig on that wait, handing a reader the qualifications and the polite guesses well before the word that says what happened. Süskind uses it in short runs, underneath the accumulating lists. The portable version is the withheld name: describe the thing for three beats before you say what it is, so the reader has already assembled a scent, a face or a motive by the time the label arrives.

Patrick Süskind's Writing Style

Breakdown of Patrick Süskind's writing style: sentence structure, tone, pacing, and dialogue.

Sentence Structure

Count the repeats in that Paris passage. One verb, one preposition, a new noun in the slot each time. Because the frame holds still, the ear stops hearing it and registers only the differences between the things, so the pile arrives as pressure rather than as a list. Süskind is also writing for a grammar that parks the finite verb at the far end of a subordinate clause, and he uses the wait: a long German period can hold four members open and settle nothing until its last word, which is why an accumulation in German sounds like something being wound rather than something being listed. Then a short main clause clears the table. English offers no such stall, so an imitator working in English has to build the delay out of something else.

Vocabulary Complexity

His smell words are the names of goods. Dung, mutton fat, sulphur, tanner's lye, congealed blood, greasy sheets, rotten teeth. Each of those brings a place, a trade and a surface with it, where an adjective like acrid brings a rating. On the perfumer's side of the book the register switches to shop talk: tinctures, absolutes, distillation, maceration, enfleurage. Almost none of it is explained, and the refusal to explain is what buys belief, because a writer who glosses a term admits he is looking at the trade from outside it.

Tone

Cold voice, hot material. The narrator reports a murder in the same measured cadence he gives to the contents of a perfumer's shelves, and that evenness makes the content bearable and unbearable at the same time. There is irony in it, though it lands in no single joke. It lives in the distance between how a sentence sounds and what the sentence says, and that distance holds only while the sentence sounds like a record. Add one horrified adverb and the whole mechanism drops into melodrama.

Pacing

The clock runs at whatever speed the nose requires. Grenouille's childhood with Madame Gaillard and then with Grimal the tanner goes past in a few paragraphs, while the single afternoon in Baldini's shop, where he rebuilds a rival perfume from memory and slops the ingredients together without weighing any of them, runs on for pages. Then the plot stops for seven years, because outside the cave in the Plomb du Cantal nothing happens at all. Süskind spends pages where perception is dense and skips whole seasons where it is thin. The ratio transfers to books with nothing in them to smell.

Dialogue Style

People in Perfume talk business. Baldini haggles, Grimal gives orders, Father Terrier tries to get rid of a baby he finds unnatural, and none of them says what he feels, because the novel takes no interest in what they feel. Grenouille barely speaks. The largest scenes in the book are silent ones, which throws the weight onto perception and handiwork. Süskind can do the opposite when he wants to. Der Kontrabass is a full evening of one orchestral player talking about his instrument and a singer, and the talking is all that is left of him.

Descriptive Approach

Description here has to change something or it does not get on the page. The scent of the girl in the Rue des Marais is no mood passage. It is the reason a man crosses Paris, waits in a courtyard until the household has gone quiet, and kills a stranger because a smell has no other way of being kept. Süskind also holds names back: first the pursuit, then the table, then the yellow plums she is cleaning, and only afterwards the word for what he has been smelling. A reader who gets the object before the label assembles it privately and keeps it. Try the order on a room you know well. Things first, verdict last.

Signature Writing Techniques

Signature writing techniques Patrick Süskind uses across their work.

The source noun

Süskind's smell words are the names of the things producing the smell, so the reader does the sensing. Dung, mutton fat, wet stone, tanner's lye. Each of those carries a place and a trade and a texture that no adjective carries, and stacked together they build a room a reader can stand in. The test costs nothing. Write the same paragraph twice, once in adjectives and once in source nouns, then read both aloud to somebody who has not seen the page.

The held frame

One clause shape, repeated, with a new noun in the slot. Süskind drives it for pages at the opening of Perfume and then largely drops it, and the dropping matters as much as the device does, because an accumulation that turns up twice in a chapter has stopped accumulating. Scarcity is the second half of the technique. Go through your draft, find every place where a list is carrying the paragraph, and keep the two where the pile itself is the point.

The negative fact

Grenouille smells of nothing at all, and Süskind treats that absence as a physical property with consequences other people can feel. A wet nurse hands the baby back because he has no smell. People and animals grow uneasy near him without being able to say why, and only in the cave does he work out the reason himself. Write what your character lacks as concretely as what they have, and let other people react to the lack before the character notices it.

The chronicler's warrant

The narrator behaves like a historian. He dates things, weighs them, and disapproves at a steady volume. That register is a licence, because it lets an impossible premise pass as documented fact: the sentences have the manners of a file rather than the manners of a fantasy. Take the most factual prose your subject will tolerate and put the least believable thing you own inside it.

Complicity by arithmetic

Süskind gives his character a goal, a method, and a run of reasonable next steps, and because each step follows from the one before it, the reader keeps doing the sums. By the time the method calls for a body, the sums are already in your handwriting. Patricia Highsmith runs the same trick in The Talented Mr Ripley, where Tom's problem-solving is so orderly that catching yourself hoping he gets away with it is part of the design. The lever is proof, not charm.

The expert's filing system

Grenouille sorts. He grades scents, shelves them, and keeps thousands in an inner store he can walk back into at will, and the prose picks up that grammar: counting, ranking, comparing. A hypertrophied sense turns a character into a taxonomist, and from then on the taxonomy is doing the characterisation for you. Poe used the move in The Tell-Tale Heart, where the narrator's case for his own sanity rests on how finely he hears. Give your obsessive a filing system and let the reader read the labels.

Literary Devices Patrick Süskind Uses

Literary devices that define Patrick Süskind's style.

Accumulation with an anaphoric frame

The Paris opening runs member after member with no conjunctions and the same opening words each time, which is accumulation working together with anaphora. German school analysis calls the pile Akkumulation and the repeated opening Anapher. Dropping the conjunctions speeds the run up, repeating the frame stops it scattering, and between them they let a page of nouns behave like a single sentence that keeps climbing. The run ends on the king because the last member is the one a reader carries out of the chapter.

Free indirect style, or erlebte Rede

Grenouille's judgements arrive inside the narration unannounced, third person, past tense, without a quotation mark or a tag to mark the handover, so a reader is already inside the reasoning before noticing whose reasoning it is. Süskind leaves those transitions bare, and the complicity depends on it. What is unusual here is the content of the borrowed mind, because the reader takes over a piece of sensory analysis rather than a feeling and comes away having used somebody else's nose.

Structural irony from an intrusive narrator

The narrator judges. He calls his protagonist abhorrent in the first sentence, comments on the century, then withholds comment at the exact places a reader wants one. Because the verdict comes early and the explanation comes slowly, the irony is structural rather than verbal and hangs on no single clever line. Cut the openly evaluative sentences and what remains is a case file.

The leitmotif scent

The one scent Grenouille chases across Paris comes back as a standard. Everything Grenouille later does in Grasse is measured against it, and Laure Richis is chosen because she matches it. A motif of that kind does construction work: it makes a repeat recognisable, and it turns the last third of the novel into the settlement of something set up in the first. Give an obsession one specific original, then refer the rest of the book back to that single thing.

Imitation Mistakes

Common imitation mistakes when copying Patrick Süskind.

Reaching for a pile of adjectives

Heady, cloying, intoxicating, acrid. Four adjectives and the reader has smelled nothing, because an adjective delivers a verdict about a smell in place of the smell. Süskind's sentences are heavy with nouns and thin on modifiers, and that ratio is the technique rather than a side effect of it. Count both in your own paragraph. When the modifiers outnumber the source nouns, you are telling a reader how to feel about an odour you have not handed over.

Describing beautifully and changing nothing

The commonest failure is a gorgeous sensory paragraph that could be lifted out with no damage to the chapter. In Perfume the descriptions are load-bearing, because a smell is the motive, the evidence and the murder weapon at once. Test each set piece by deleting it. If the scene that follows still works, either wire the description into the plot or cut it, and be honest with yourself about which of the two you did.

Mistaking the cold voice for an empty one

Süskind's narrator is detached and opinionated at the same time, and imitators tend to take the first half. He takes a position on his protagonist, states it once, and then lets it stand without ever saying it again, and going quiet after a verdict is not the same as having none. A voice with no position of its own reads as flat rather than as controlled. Decide what your narrator thinks, say it once, early and plainly, then report on as though the matter were settled.

Copying the monster instead of the method

A protagonist who murders is not the reason Perfume works. What carries it is a goal stated in plain words, steps that follow one from another, and a narrator who logs the steps without flinching. Point the same machinery at a locksmith, a sommelier or a clerk. It survives the change of subject intact. The murderer is only the costume that the technique happened to be wearing when the novel appeared in 1985.

Books

Explore Patrick Süskind's books and discover the stories that shaped their writing style and voice.

Perfume
Perfume

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Patrick Süskind's writing style and techniques.

What is Patrick Süskind's writing style?: Süskind writes in a cold, faintly antique third-person voice built around one technical problem: how to put smell on a page in a language that has few words for it. His answer is to name sources instead of sensations, stack them inside a repeated clause frame until they accumulate, and tie each one to something a character then does about it. Over the top of that sits an intrusive narrator who passes judgement early and reports flatly afterwards. The shorter books keep the voice and drop the perfume.
How does Süskind describe smell in Perfume?: By naming what produces the smell and letting the reader supply the sensation. The novel opens on a Paris where the chimneys stink of sulphur, the tanneries of caustic lye, the slaughterhouses of congealed blood, and the people themselves of sweat and unwashed clothes, and the run keeps climbing through the trades and the parishes until the king stinks too. Look at the shape: one verb, one preposition, a fresh noun per member. The adjectives are doing almost nothing, and the nouns are doing a job adjectives fail at.
What happens in the cave scene, and why is it in the middle?: Grenouille spends seven years alone in a cave inside the Plomb du Cantal, and there he discovers that he has no smell of his own. It sits in the middle because it is the hinge: the first half is a nose collecting the world, the second is a man manufacturing the one thing he lacks. As craft it is a long interior stretch with almost no external event, held up by an inventory of remembered scents. That inventory was earned page by page in the first half, which is the only reason the scene holds.
Can you use any of this if you are not writing about smell?: The wiring travels, the subject does not. Three moves carry across: name the source rather than the sensation, repeat one clause frame so a list turns into a rise, and give each perception a consequence in the following sentence. Point them at sound, food, weather or money and they behave the same way. The perfume is the demonstration.
Why does the 2006 film feel so different from the novel?: Because Tom Tykwer had to solve a problem the novel does not have. Prose can name a source and let a reader's memory do the smelling. Film has to show something, so the adaptation converts smell into close-ups, sound and Ben Whishaw's face receiving it. Readers who arrive from the film and want the technique should start with the first chapter of the book, which is where the method lives and also the part that does not survive the move to images.
Which Süskind book teaches the technique fastest?: Perfume for the sensory method, and Die Taube for the same voice on a small canvas. A Paris bank guard finds a pigeon in the corridor outside his room and his life comes apart inside a day, which shows what the style does with an ordinary subject and is short enough to reread in an evening with a pencil in your hand, marking each place where a physical detail takes over a job that a sentence about feeling would usually do. Der Kontrabass is the outlier, a monologue for one player, and it is where you hear Süskind write a voice rather than a nose.

Ready to improve your draft with direction?

Open Prosematter, bring your draft, and move from stuck to a stronger draft without losing your voice. Editors are on standby when you want a deeper pass.

Fix My Draft

Free welcome credits included. No credit card needed.