What was Nathaniel Hawthorne's writing style?

Hawthorne wrote in the dark romantic mode: third-person narration held at a formal distance, long balanced sentences, heavy symbolism, and a moral question the narrator declines to close. The material is Puritan New England, and the subject is a private sin committed inside a congregation that watches its members and keeps its own calendar for forgiveness. His plots are thin on incident and thick on consequence. What you are meant to watch is a reputation hardening, and a person rearranging a whole life around a meaning somebody else assigned them.

What is the writing style of The Scarlet Letter?

The Scarlet Letter is narrated in a formal third person by a voice that claims to be editing a found document rather than inventing a story. That frame comes from the Custom-House sketch at the front. Everything after it inherits the tone of a man reporting an old case. Sentences run long and hinged, each new clause adjusting the last. Diction sits high. Public-doctrine words do the judging on the town's behalf, and plain concrete nouns are left to carry what it costs a person. The symbolism is unmissable and still unresolved: the letter, the scaffold, the forest, the brook Pearl will not cross. Almost nothing gets explained, and that is the design.

What literary devices does Nathaniel Hawthorne use?

Symbolism, allegory, irony and studied ambiguity, in roughly that order of visibility. A symbol in Hawthorne is a physical thing before it means anything: the letter is embroidery, the veil is crape, the birthmark on Georgiana's cheek in The Birth-Mark is a small red hand. Allegory shapes the larger design, so a walk into the woods in Young Goodman Brown doubles as a faith collapsing in one night. The irony is mostly dramatic. You know who Chillingworth and Dimmesdale really are long before the town does. The ambiguity is load-bearing rather than decorative, and it is why his endings stay open.

What kind of writing was Nathaniel Hawthorne known for?

Short stories, and what he insisted on calling romances rather than novels. The tales came first, collected in Twice-Told Tales and Mosses from an Old Manse, and they are where the method was built: one situation, one sign, one effect. The Scarlet Letter, The House of the Seven Gables, The Blithedale Romance and The Marble Faun are the long books, and all four keep the tale's habits at greater length. He drew the line between the two forms himself. In the preface to The House of the Seven Gables he claims that a romance may bend the actual so long as it does not swerve from the truth of the human heart, which is his license for curses, ghosts and a letter that seems to scorch.

Why does the end of The Scarlet Letter give more than one version of what happened?

Because Hawthorne would rather report a disagreement than settle one. When Dimmesdale opens his shirt on the scaffold, the narrator gathers the accounts and lays them side by side: some spectators saw a scarlet letter in the flesh, some said he had cut it there himself, some laid it to Chillingworth's drugs and magic, and certain respectable witnesses denied there was any mark at all. The multiple-choice ending does two jobs at once: it keeps the fact of the guilt while dissolving the proof, and it hands the reader the work the narrator refused. Try it on your own last page. Give three witnesses, let them contradict each other on the detail that matters, and keep them agreed on the consequence.

How do you keep a symbol from turning into a lecture?

Make somebody pay to touch it. In the forest, Hester unpins the letter, throws it toward the brook and lets her hair down, and for a page the book turns warm. Then Pearl refuses to cross the brook to her. A child enforcing the town's sentence tells you more about how shame gets handed down than a paragraph of commentary could, and it costs the narrator not one word of opinion. Flannery O'Connor set out the same rule in Mystery and Manners with the wooden leg in Good Country People: it is a wooden leg first, needed by the plot as an object, and it collects its meaning from the way three people feel about it. Give your object a price, a keeper and a witness. Your narrator can then keep quiet and lose nothing.

Fiction

Nathaniel Hawthorne Writing Style

Born July 4, 1804 – Died May 19, 1864

Analysis by Prosematter's editorial team · Updated August 30, 2026

Hawthorne's style is symbolic allegory with the verdict withheld, and watching the scarlet letter change meaning across one novel shows you how to build that pressure into a modern scene.

Write like Nathaniel Hawthorne See how editing in Prosematter works

Writing Style Overview

Writing style overview of Nathaniel Hawthorne: voice, themes, and technique.

Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote dark romantic allegory. The sentences are formal and weighed, and the design puts one visible sign in the middle of a community that cannot stop arguing about it. The Scarlet Letter is the clearest case. Hester Prynne wears an embroidered A on her dress, and the book spends far less time on what she did than on how Boston reads the letter, how the letter begins to read her back, and what the reading costs the two men who know where it came from. Three scaffold scenes carry the structure. The town gathers for the first, Dimmesdale climbs the platform alone at midnight for the second, and the third puts the whole cast in the same square in daylight.

His engine is interpretation. He sets a fact in front of a crowd, lets the crowd assign it a meaning, and then shows the meaning hardening into a fate. By the later chapters the townspeople have decided the A means Able, a promotion Hester was not offered and a verdict she has no way to appeal. The letter is the cheap half of that invention. The reading is the expensive half.

His sentences run the same operation at a smaller scale: a judgment, then a qualification hung on it, then a physical detail that stops the qualification drifting. Copy the diction and you have a costume. The withholding is the part that does the work.

He is worth study now because he solved a problem that has not gone away: how to make private guilt visible on the page without parking a character in front of a mirror to narrate their own conscience. His answer was to give the guilt a public object and let other people handle it. That is why a book about one woman's conscience spends so much of its time on what her neighbors say.

How to Write Like Nathaniel Hawthorne

Writing techniques and exercises to emulate Nathaniel Hawthorne.

1
Give the secret a public object
Pick a thing that can be seen across a room and handled by strangers: a letter sewn onto a dress, a veil, a mark on a face, a deed in a locked drawer. Hawthorne's rule is that the object exists literally before it means anything. Buy it, sew it, describe the thread. Then hand it to the community. The moment other people can point at it, your character's private trouble acquires a public price, and you stop needing interior monologue to make guilt visible. Write the first scene as pure staging, and end it before anyone explains why the thing matters.
2
Let the town do the naming
Write a scene where a group assigns your protagonist a meaning she did not choose. In The Scarlet Letter that happens twice and lands differently each time: first on the scaffold, where the crowd reads the A as adultery, then years later, when the same town has quietly reassigned it to Able because Hester nurses their sick. Neither reading asks her permission. Keep the group small enough to have a memory, since a crowd that forgets cannot convict anybody twice. Then make your protagonist act on the new meaning instead of arguing with it. Arguing is a modern reflex and it lets the pressure out.
3
Stage the turns on a threshold
Hawthorne puts his decisions at edges. The prison door with a rosebush beside it, the scaffold steps, the boundary of the forest, the brook Pearl refuses to cross: each one turns an interior change into a movement the reader can watch. Borrow the geometry. Before you draft a scene where somebody changes their mind, decide where the line runs and make crossing it cost something practical. A doorway will do. So will a gate, a county line, the last row of pews, or the point in a corridor past which your character can no longer pretend to be going somewhere else.
4
Build the sentence that argues with itself
Draft the flat version first, then load it. Hawthorne's long sentences move in three beats: a claim stated with confidence, a clause that narrows or doubts it, and a concrete image that stops the doubt turning into fog. Place the qualification after the reader has already formed a judgment, so it works as a correction rather than a hedge. End on the thing you can see. Then set one short sentence behind it like a nail. The rhythm matters more than the vocabulary, and a modern lexicon will carry the same structure without the fancy dress.
5
Refuse the last verdict
Write your ending twice. In the first version, say what it meant. In the second, delete that and give the reader the competing accounts instead, the way the townspeople disagree about what was on Dimmesdale's chest. Hawthorne holds one side steady and lets the other float: the consequence stays fixed, and only the explanation is up for argument. Copy that split. Keep the facts of what happened hard and specific, keep the meaning contested, and resist the urge to award the argument to the character you like.

Nathaniel Hawthorne's Writing Style

Breakdown of Nathaniel Hawthorne's writing style: sentence structure, tone, pacing, and dialogue.

Sentence Structure

Long sentences do his moral arithmetic and short ones deliver the verdicts. He likes balanced constructions that weigh one possibility against another, which make the narrator sound scrupulous while the character's options quietly shrink. The swing between the two is the technique: a long approach, then a clean line, like a lantern carried into a dark room.

Vocabulary Complexity

Two registers, used against each other. For public judgment he reaches for Latinate abstractions out of doctrine and the courtroom, words like ignominy and penance that arrive with a verdict already inside them. For what a person undergoes he switches to short concrete nouns, the thread, the scaffold, the hand at the heart. The contrast is the effect. The abstract words supply the tribunal and the plain ones supply the body, and a sentence that travels from one to the other performs the distance between how a community talks about sin and what sin does to somebody's afternoon. Imitators collect the old words and skip the switch, which is how you end up with a museum voice.

Tone

Patient, formal, and unwilling to let anybody off, the reader included. The voice sounds fair-minded almost to a fault, which is what makes its refusals land: it grants a character every mitigating circumstance and then declines to acquit. Melville reviewed Mosses from an Old Manse in 1850, called what he found there a "power of blackness," and dedicated Moby-Dick to him the following year. The darkness is not gothic decoration. It sits in the assumption running under the sentences, that people are worse than they present and communities worse than the people in them, and what keeps that from souring is a compassion he refuses to convert into forgiveness.

Pacing

Few events, examined hard. He will spend a chapter on a conversation and cover a year in a clause, and the acceleration follows one rule: time compresses while the world is merely reacting and stretches as soon as a meaning is about to shift. Poe reviewed Twice-Told Tales and used it to argue that a tale should be built for a single effect a reader can take in at one sitting, and Hawthorne kept that discipline at greater length. The House of the Seven Gables gives a whole chapter to a dead man in a chair while the narrator talks at the corpse about the appointments he is missing. Nothing happens. The pressure rises anyway, because the thing advancing is the reader's certainty about what this family has been.

Dialogue Style

People in Hawthorne speak in public, even when they are alone. Speech is a performance of what a person is permitted to say, so the interesting part sits underneath it: the pieties, the evasions, the question asked in a way that lets the asker deny having asked. Hester, told on the scaffold to name the father, says she will not, and the refusal outweighs any speech she could have given. Pearl asks what the adults have agreed to avoid, which makes a child the one reliable interrogator in the book. When somebody finally speaks plainly, the plainness registers as violence, because the talk around it has been managed so carefully.

Descriptive Approach

He describes little and weights what he keeps. The first chapter of The Scarlet Letter gives you a prison door, a plot of weeds, and one wild rosebush, and then the narrator hands the reader a flower from it. That is the whole set: a society's machinery for punishment, with something growing beside it that the machinery did not plant. Detail arrives already judged. Light through a window, a garment, a mark, a threshold, each chosen because it can be returned to. He avoids inventory. What he wants from a room is the one object that will still be doing work three chapters later, which makes his descriptions read less like scenery than like equipment being laid out.

Signature Writing Techniques

Signature writing techniques Nathaniel Hawthorne uses across their work.

Symbol as public property

He gives one object to the whole cast and lets them fight over it. The A is embroidery Hester made herself, cloth the magistrates imposed, a toy Pearl grabs at, and the proof Chillingworth needs. Because four people want different things from the same square of fabric, the object keeps generating scenes instead of summarizing them. Toni Morrison runs the same principle in Beloved, where the scars on Sethe's back are a chokecherry tree because Amy Denver decided to call them one. Keep the meaning in other people's mouths and keep it contested.

Multiple choice at the ending

Where a scene turns on a fact he would rather leave unsettled, he reports the versions and stops. Young Goodman Brown ends by asking whether the whole witch-meeting was a dream and answering "be it so if you will," then following the man home to a lifetime of gloom regardless. The doubt costs the story nothing because the aftermath is concrete. This is harder than vagueness. You have to know exactly what happened, write the scene as though you were about to tell, and then withhold at the single point where the reader's answer will implicate them.

The repeated stage

Three times The Scarlet Letter returns to the same scaffold. Each return finds the cast rearranged. First Hester alone in daylight with the town watching. Then Dimmesdale on the platform at midnight with no witness but a meteor. Then all of them in the open at once. Nothing has to be explained between the visits because the platform carries the memory, which is how years of change compress into three scenes. Pick your own stage early, put something ordinary on it, and come back only when the arrangement has changed.

The found manuscript

The Custom-House sketch at the front of The Scarlet Letter has the narrator find a faded rag letter and a dead surveyor's papers in a heap of attic lumber. It is a frame, and it does real work. He can claim to be transmitting a record rather than inventing one, which licenses the flat certainty of his statements about people he could not possibly have watched. Modern equivalents are plentiful: the case file, the transcript, the recovered phone. Reach for one when your narrator needs an authority he has not earned by being present.

The narrator at long range

The ladder of psychic distance John Gardner sets out in The Art of Fiction runs from a far, formal vantage down to raw sensation inside a character's skin. Hawthorne works at the far end and mostly stays there. That is why the prose can weigh a soul and describe a market square in the same paragraph, and why the rare step forward hits so hard, such as Dimmesdale's hand going to his heart. The cost is real. Held at that height a scene generates little heat of its own, so he pays for the distance with symbols and consequences that do the heating for him.

Thresholds and enclosures

His spaces are shaped like arguments. A prison door with a wild rosebush growing at its threshold opens the novel, and the pairing states the book's terms before a character speaks. The forest permits what the settlement forbids. The garden in Rappaccini's Daughter is a place you cannot leave without poison. Build your rooms this way and description stops being scenery, because the walls take over some of the work the narrator would otherwise have to do out loud, and a character crossing a sill becomes an event.

Literary Devices Nathaniel Hawthorne Uses

Literary devices that define Nathaniel Hawthorne's style.

Symbolism

One physical object carries the argument of the book. The A on Hester's dress, the black crape veil Hooper puts on and refuses to lift, the crimson hand on Georgiana's cheek: each is an ordinary item before it is a meaning, and each stays in play because the people around it disagree. The device saves him enormous quantities of explanation. A scene can advance the moral question by putting the object into a new pair of hands, which is why the book can keep moving while almost nothing is happening in the plot. It also gives him a clock, since the reader starts anticipating the next appearance and calculating what it will cost this time.

Allegory

Underneath the realistic surface, his stories run a second track on which the events also mean something schematic. Young Goodman Brown walks into the forest at night and finds his neighbors, his catechism teacher and his wife at a devil's communion, and the walk is also a faith giving way in the space of one night. He keeps it from stiffening into a puzzle by refusing the key: the story declines to confirm that the meeting was real. A symbol suggests meanings, while an allegory insists on being decoded. Hawthorne works the seam between the two, which is why his stories survive the reading that solves them.

Dramatic irony

He tells the reader early and lets the characters stay ignorant for most of the book. You learn that Chillingworth is Hester's husband before the town does, and you work out that Dimmesdale is Pearl's father long before he says so in the open. Every civil exchange between the physician and the minister then reads as an interrogation with one participant unaware that it is one. The device converts patience into suspense. Nothing has to happen in a scene for it to be unbearable, because the gap between what is said and what is known does the work that action would otherwise have to do.

Ambiguity

He builds doubt in at the exact points where certainty would close the book. Matthiessen named the habit the device of multiple choice in American Renaissance, and once you have seen it you find it working across the whole shelf: several accounts of what was on Dimmesdale's chest, a dream offered as an alternative to a witches' meeting, a curse that may or may not explain why a Pyncheon dies with blood on his shirt front. The doubt sits away from the outcome. Somebody is still ruined, still dead, still marked. The effect is to put the reader where the townspeople stand, asked to judge on incomplete evidence and left to notice how fast they were willing to do it.

Imitation Mistakes

Common imitation mistakes when copying Nathaniel Hawthorne.

Wearing the diction and skipping the machinery

The archaic vocabulary is the most copyable thing about him and the least load-bearing. Writers reach for thee and ere, stretch the clauses, and produce a page that sounds solemn and does nothing. His diction earns its keep because it belongs to an institution: it is the language magistrates and congregations use to judge people, set against plain words for what a body actually suffers. Take the institution away and the high register has nothing left to be high above. Build the judging community first. The vocabulary is a consequence of that choice, and a modern one will serve if the pressure underneath is real.

Explaining the symbol on its first appearance

Naming what a symbol means converts an open question into a decoded one, and the story becomes an exercise with an answer key at the back. Hawthorne withholds the explanation for chapters at a stretch, which is why the letter can pick up a new meaning from whoever handles it next. The test is one question. Would the object still be in the scene if it meant nothing at all? If the answer is no, you have written a label. A symbol that has to be explained has already stopped generating scenes, because the argument it was hosting is over.

Spreading the ambiguity over everything

Because his endings stay open, imitators blur the middle too, and the result is a story where nothing is solid enough to be doubted. Look at what he keeps hard. The dates, the geography, the sentence the magistrates hand down, the years Hester spends at her needle, the dark weed Chillingworth says grew out of a dead man's heart: the surface facts arrive with a clerk's confidence. Only motive and meaning are left unresolved, and they are unresolved at one or two chosen places. Ambiguity works like a spotlight. Spread it evenly and you have turned off the lights.

Writing emblems instead of people with excuses

Allegory tempts you into characters who are one quality each. Hawthorne does hand out labels, and the figures underneath keep making excuses for themselves, which is what keeps them alive on the page. Chillingworth has a case ready: he was wronged, he wants only the truth, and he tells himself he is studying a patient. Dimmesdale confesses from the pulpit in terms his congregation hears as humility, so he can say the thing and stay hidden behind having said it. Flatten those self-justifications and the story turns predictable, because an emblem cannot surprise itself. Give each symbolic figure one lie they tell in private, then let the plot expose the lie rather than the person.

Books

Explore Nathaniel Hawthorne's books and discover the stories that shaped their writing style and voice.

The Scarlet Letter
The Scarlet Letter

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Nathaniel Hawthorne's writing style and techniques.

What was Nathaniel Hawthorne's writing style?: Hawthorne wrote in the dark romantic mode: third-person narration held at a formal distance, long balanced sentences, heavy symbolism, and a moral question the narrator declines to close. The material is Puritan New England, and the subject is a private sin committed inside a congregation that watches its members and keeps its own calendar for forgiveness. His plots are thin on incident and thick on consequence. What you are meant to watch is a reputation hardening, and a person rearranging a whole life around a meaning somebody else assigned them.
What is the writing style of The Scarlet Letter?: The Scarlet Letter is narrated in a formal third person by a voice that claims to be editing a found document rather than inventing a story. That frame comes from the Custom-House sketch at the front. Everything after it inherits the tone of a man reporting an old case. Sentences run long and hinged, each new clause adjusting the last. Diction sits high. Public-doctrine words do the judging on the town's behalf, and plain concrete nouns are left to carry what it costs a person. The symbolism is unmissable and still unresolved: the letter, the scaffold, the forest, the brook Pearl will not cross. Almost nothing gets explained, and that is the design.
What literary devices does Nathaniel Hawthorne use?: Symbolism, allegory, irony and studied ambiguity, in roughly that order of visibility. A symbol in Hawthorne is a physical thing before it means anything: the letter is embroidery, the veil is crape, the birthmark on Georgiana's cheek in The Birth-Mark is a small red hand. Allegory shapes the larger design, so a walk into the woods in Young Goodman Brown doubles as a faith collapsing in one night. The irony is mostly dramatic. You know who Chillingworth and Dimmesdale really are long before the town does. The ambiguity is load-bearing rather than decorative, and it is why his endings stay open.
What kind of writing was Nathaniel Hawthorne known for?: Short stories, and what he insisted on calling romances rather than novels. The tales came first, collected in Twice-Told Tales and Mosses from an Old Manse, and they are where the method was built: one situation, one sign, one effect. The Scarlet Letter, The House of the Seven Gables, The Blithedale Romance and The Marble Faun are the long books, and all four keep the tale's habits at greater length. He drew the line between the two forms himself. In the preface to The House of the Seven Gables he claims that a romance may bend the actual so long as it does not swerve from the truth of the human heart, which is his license for curses, ghosts and a letter that seems to scorch.
Why does the end of The Scarlet Letter give more than one version of what happened?: Because Hawthorne would rather report a disagreement than settle one. When Dimmesdale opens his shirt on the scaffold, the narrator gathers the accounts and lays them side by side: some spectators saw a scarlet letter in the flesh, some said he had cut it there himself, some laid it to Chillingworth's drugs and magic, and certain respectable witnesses denied there was any mark at all. The multiple-choice ending does two jobs at once: it keeps the fact of the guilt while dissolving the proof, and it hands the reader the work the narrator refused. Try it on your own last page. Give three witnesses, let them contradict each other on the detail that matters, and keep them agreed on the consequence.
How do you keep a symbol from turning into a lecture?: Make somebody pay to touch it. In the forest, Hester unpins the letter, throws it toward the brook and lets her hair down, and for a page the book turns warm. Then Pearl refuses to cross the brook to her. A child enforcing the town's sentence tells you more about how shame gets handed down than a paragraph of commentary could, and it costs the narrator not one word of opinion. Flannery O'Connor set out the same rule in Mystery and Manners with the wooden leg in Good Country People: it is a wooden leg first, needed by the plot as an object, and it collects its meaning from the way three people feel about it. Give your object a price, a keeper and a witness. Your narrator can then keep quiet and lose nothing.

Ready to improve your draft with direction?

Open Prosematter, bring your draft, and move from stuck to a stronger draft without losing your voice. Editors are on standby when you want a deeper pass.

Fix My Draft

Free welcome credits included. No credit card needed.